The Declaration of Helsinki is a set of ethical principles that govern the conduct of medical research involving human subjects. It was first adopted in 1964 and has been revised several times since then, most recently in 2013.
In the context of real-world evidence (RWE), the Declaration of Helsinki is particularly relevant because RWE often involves the collection and analysis of data from sources that were not originally intended for research purposes, such as electronic health records or claims data. This raises important ethical considerations, such as privacy and confidentiality concerns, and the need to obtain informed consent from study participants.
The Declaration of Helsinki provides guidance on these and other ethical issues related to medical research involving human subjects. For example, it states that research involving human subjects must be conducted in accordance with ethical principles, including respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. It also emphasizes the importance of obtaining informed consent from study participants, protecting their privacy and confidentiality, ensuring that the risks and benefits of the research are appropriately balanced, and ensuring research transparency by publishing the results (both positive and negative).
In the context of RWE, these ethical principles can help guide the development and implementation of research studies that use real-world data. For example, researchers can use the Declaration of Helsinki as a framework for designing studies that protect the privacy and confidentiality of study participants, obtain informed consent, and balance the risks and benefits of the research.
Overall, the Declaration of Helsinki provides important ethical guidance for medical research involving human subjects, including research that uses real-world data. Adhering to these principles can help ensure that RWE studies are conducted in an ethical and responsible manner.
Share this story...
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – ICH GCP (R3) – Real World Evidence Context
RWE 101 - ICH GCP (R3) - Real World Evidence Context Revision 2 of ICH GCP caused confusion to those of us who work with non-interventional studies. The glossary [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Non-Interventional Studies vs Market Health Research
RWE 101 - Non-Interventional Studies vs Market Health Research Key differences between a non-interventional study (NIS) and market health research include:1. Research Objective: NIS are conducted to examine real-world [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Audits vs Inspections
RWE 101 - Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 - Audits vs Inspections In the context of regulatory compliance for Real-World Evidence (RWE), both audits and inspections play crucial roles, [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – A Career of Many Pathways
RWE 101 - A Career of Many Pathways Real-world evidence (RWE) refers to the information on health care that is derived from analysis of real-world data (RWD). RWE [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Evolution of Regulatory Affairs
RWE 101 - Evolution of Regulatory Affairs Real-world evidence (RWE) and real-world data (RWD) are increasingly influencing regulatory affairs in the biopharmaceutical and healthcare industry. This change has been [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Project Managers
RWE 101 - Project Managers Real-World Evidence (RWE) observational studies and clinical trials are both key elements of medical research, but they involve very different methodologies, aims, and requirements. [...]