GLOBAL | 2024 Revision of the Declaration of Helsinki
Please login to view this page.
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – The Declaration of Helsinki
The Declaration of Helsinki is a set of ethical principles that govern the conduct of medical research involving human subjects. It was first adopted in 1964 and has been revised several times since then, most recently in 2013.
In the context of real-world evidence (RWE), the Declaration of Helsinki is particularly relevant because RWE often involves the collection and analysis of data from sources that were not originally intended for research purposes, such as electronic health records or claims data. This raises important ethical considerations, such as privacy and confidentiality concerns, and the need to obtain informed consent from study participants.
The Declaration of Helsinki provides guidance on these and other ethical issues related to medical research involving human subjects. For example, it states that research involving human subjects must be conducted in accordance with ethical principles, including respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. It also emphasizes the importance of obtaining informed consent from study participants, protecting their privacy and confidentiality, ensuring that the risks and benefits of the research are appropriately balanced, and ensuring research transparency by publishing the results (both positive and negative).
In the context of RWE, these ethical principles can help guide the development and implementation of research studies that use real-world data. For example, researchers can use the Declaration of Helsinki as a framework for designing studies that protect the privacy and confidentiality of study participants, obtain informed consent, and balance the risks and benefits of the research.
Overall, the Declaration of Helsinki provides important ethical guidance for medical research involving human subjects, including research that uses real-world data. Adhering to these principles can help ensure that RWE studies are conducted in an ethical and responsible manner.
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – ICH GCP (R3) – Real World Evidence Context
stuart.mccully2023-08-09T15:27:28+00:00August 9, 2023|2023, RWE 101|
RWE 101 - ICH GCP (R3) - Real World Evidence Context Revision 2 of ICH GCP caused confusion to those of us who work with non-interventional studies. The glossary [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Non-Interventional Studies vs Market Health Research
stuart.mccully2023-08-09T15:02:58+00:00August 9, 2023|2023, RWE 101|
RWE 101 - Non-Interventional Studies vs Market Health Research Key differences between a non-interventional study (NIS) and market health research include:1. Research Objective: NIS are conducted to examine real-world [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Audits vs Inspections
stuart.mccully2023-08-09T14:51:12+00:00August 9, 2023|2023, RWE 101|
RWE 101 - Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 - Audits vs Inspections In the context of regulatory compliance for Real-World Evidence (RWE), both audits and inspections play crucial roles, [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – A Career of Many Pathways
stuart.mccully2023-08-07T22:28:44+00:00August 7, 2023|2023, RWE 101|
RWE 101 - A Career of Many Pathways Real-world evidence (RWE) refers to the information on health care that is derived from analysis of real-world data (RWD). RWE [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Evolution of Regulatory Affairs
stuart.mccully2023-08-07T22:02:40+00:00August 7, 2023|2023, RWE 101|
RWE 101 - Evolution of Regulatory Affairs Real-world evidence (RWE) and real-world data (RWD) are increasingly influencing regulatory affairs in the biopharmaceutical and healthcare industry. This change has been [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Project Managers
stuart.mccully2023-08-07T21:50:20+00:00August 7, 2023|2023, RWE 101|
RWE 101 - Project Managers Real-World Evidence (RWE) observational studies and clinical trials are both key elements of medical research, but they involve very different methodologies, aims, and requirements. [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Ethical Foundation of RWE Research
Real-world evidence (RWE) research, which is the study of data from real-world settings, is founded on a number of ethical principles, including:
Respect for autonomy: This principle recognizes the importance of individuals’ ability to make their own decisions regarding their healthcare. In RWE research, this means obtaining informed consent from individuals before using their data.
Beneficence: This principle requires that researchers seek to maximize the benefits of their research while minimizing any potential harm. In RWE research, this means ensuring that the research is designed to answer important questions that will improve health outcomes for individuals.
Non-maleficence: This principle requires that researchers avoid causing harm to study participants. In RWE research, this means minimizing any risks associated with data collection and use, such as breaches of confidentiality.
Justice: This principle requires that researchers treat individuals fairly and equitably, ensuring that the benefits and burdens of the research are distributed fairly. In RWE research, this means ensuring that the use of data is transparent and that individuals are not unfairly excluded from research opportunities.
In addition to these principles, RWE research is also guided by ethical standards established by international bodies, such as the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki. These standards emphasize the importance of obtaining informed consent, protecting privacy and confidentiality, and ensuring that research is conducted in a manner that respects the dignity and rights of study participants.
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – ICH GCP (R3) – Real World Evidence Context
stuart.mccully2023-08-09T15:27:28+00:00August 9, 2023|2023, RWE 101|
RWE 101 - ICH GCP (R3) - Real World Evidence Context Revision 2 of ICH GCP caused confusion to those of us who work with non-interventional studies. The glossary [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Non-Interventional Studies vs Market Health Research
stuart.mccully2023-08-09T15:02:58+00:00August 9, 2023|2023, RWE 101|
RWE 101 - Non-Interventional Studies vs Market Health Research Key differences between a non-interventional study (NIS) and market health research include:1. Research Objective: NIS are conducted to examine real-world [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Audits vs Inspections
stuart.mccully2023-08-09T14:51:12+00:00August 9, 2023|2023, RWE 101|
RWE 101 - Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 - Audits vs Inspections In the context of regulatory compliance for Real-World Evidence (RWE), both audits and inspections play crucial roles, [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – A Career of Many Pathways
stuart.mccully2023-08-07T22:28:44+00:00August 7, 2023|2023, RWE 101|
RWE 101 - A Career of Many Pathways Real-world evidence (RWE) refers to the information on health care that is derived from analysis of real-world data (RWD). RWE [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Evolution of Regulatory Affairs
stuart.mccully2023-08-07T22:02:40+00:00August 7, 2023|2023, RWE 101|
RWE 101 - Evolution of Regulatory Affairs Real-world evidence (RWE) and real-world data (RWD) are increasingly influencing regulatory affairs in the biopharmaceutical and healthcare industry. This change has been [...]
Real World Evidence (RWE) 101 – Project Managers
stuart.mccully2023-08-07T21:50:20+00:00August 7, 2023|2023, RWE 101|
RWE 101 - Project Managers Real-World Evidence (RWE) observational studies and clinical trials are both key elements of medical research, but they involve very different methodologies, aims, and requirements. [...]